In the Twilight of Western Thought

Introduction

Filed under: Introduction

Welcome to a study guide for Herman Dooyeweerd’s In the Twilight of Western Thought. It is at the moment a working document. If any one has any comments, criticism or suggestions please make them! A version of the guide is also available at www.newcritique.com. Paul Otto’s excellent paper examining the different versions of the book is now available: ‘In the twilight of Dooyeweerd’s corpusPhilosophia Reformata 70 (1).

 

Introduction to In the Twilight of Western Thought

 

Dooyeweerd’s book In the Twilight of Western Thought had its origins in a series of lectures that Dooyeweerd delivered in the United States during 1958.  The lecture tour was sponsored by the Reformed Fellowship.  Dooyeweerd’s original handwritten lectures notes were typed and edited for publication by Dr Henry van Til.

The book comprises eight chapters. The first two chapters examine what Dooyeweerd called the ‘pretended autonomy of theoretical thought’; the next two look at ‘historicism’ (an example of apostate thought); the next three examine the relation between philosophy and religion; and the final one examines anthropology.

Twilight has been published in three editions.  The first in 1960 by Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.  An errata sheet was distributed with this edition identifying a number of typographical mistakes.  In 1965 a second edition appeared, published by Craig Press (this was reprinted in 1968, 1972, 1975 and 1980), this book took into account the errors identified in the first edition including a mislaced paragraph.

The most recent edition, of 1999, was edited by James K. A. Smith and incorporated into the Collected Works of Herman Dooyeweerd (Series B, Volume 4), published under the general editorship of D. F. M. Strauss by Edwin Mellen Press.  Unfortunately, this edition did not take into account the errors found in the first edition.

Paul Otto (2005) has traced the development of the book from its first incarnation in 1960 to the most recent in 1999. He has identified a number of variations (see the table here – reproduced with the author’s kind permission) between the editions. 

 

 

Introductions to Dooyeweerd

Filed under: Introduction

There are a number of useful introductions to Dooyeweerd’s WdW. (A fuller list is available here.) These include:

         Books sympathetic to Dooyeweerd’s approach

  • L Kalsbeek Contours of a Christian Philosophy: An Introduction to Herman Dooyeweerd’s Thought. Wedge: Toronto, 1975. The sub-title accurately describes the book.
  • J M Spier An Introduction to Christian Philosophy. Craig Press: Nutley , NJ, 1973 (orig 1954). The Christian philosophy in the title is WdW.
  • S Wolfe A Key to Dooyeweerd. Presbyterian and Reformed: Nutley, NJ, 1978. This introduces Dooyeweerd’s modal theory only and consequently it is much narrower in scope than the other books.
  • Roy Clouser The Myth of Religious Neutrality. University of Notre Dame Press: Notre Dame, 1991. Somewhat more than an introduction to Dooyeweerd’s thought. In it Clouser expounds and defends some of Dooyeweerd’s views.
  • Peter Steen The Structure of Dooyeweerd’s Thought. Wedge: Toronto, 1983.
  • Yong Joon Choi Dialogue and Antithesis.
  • Books critical of Dooyewerd’s approach

  • Robert A Morey. The Dooyeweerdian Concept of the Word of God. Presbyterian and Reformed, 1974. A polemic criticising Dooyeweerdian uses of the Word of God.
  • Vincent Brummer. Transcendental Criticism and Christian Philosophy. T. Wever, 1961.
  • Ronald H Nash. Dooyeweerd and the Amsterdam Philosophy. Zondervan: Grand Rapids, 1962. This book aims to introduce readers to Dooyeweerd and point out what he perceives as problems that need clarification or revision.
  • J Douma Another Look at Dooyeweerd: Some Critical Notes Regarding the Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea. Premier Publishing, Manitoba, no date.
  • John M. Frame and Leonard J. Coppes The Amsterdam Philosophy: A Preliminary Critique.
  • Articles sympathetic to Dooyeweerd’s approach
  • Roy Clouser. A sketch of Dooyeweerd’s philosophy of science. In Facets of Faith and Science. pp.81-97.
  • Roy Clouser. The impact of Dooyeweerd’s philosophy on the natural sciences: whence the difference? In Christian Philosophy at the Close of the 20th Century. Ed Griffoen & Balk. Kampen Kok, 1995.
  • Andrew Hartley. The philosophy of the law idea and the role of the prescientific in statistical inference Journal of the ACMS Dec 2004.
  • Jacob Klapwijk. The struggle for a Christian philosophy: another look at Dooyeweerd. The Reformed Journal. Volume 30 Issue 2 February 1980. Pages 12-15.
  • Jacob Klapwijk Dooyeweerd’s Christian philosophy: antithesis and critique. The Reformed Journal Volume 30 Issue 3 March 1980. Pages 20-24.
  • Richard Russell In defence of Dooyeweerd and of Christian philosophy Spectrum 23:2 Summer 1991. Pages 147-159.
  • James W. Skillen. Herman Dooyeweerd’s contribution to the philosophy of the social sciences. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation March 1979. Pages 20-24.
  • Brian Walsh/ Jon Chaplin. Dooyeweerd’s contribution to a Christian philosophical paradigm.
  • William Young. Herman Dooyeweerd. In Creative Minds in Contemporary Theology. Edited by Philip Edgcumbe Hughes. Pages 270-305.
  • William Young The nature of man in the Amsterdam philosophy. Westminster Theological Journal. Vol. 22 no 1 1959 p1-12.
  • Articles critical of Dooyeweerd’s approach

  • Lester DeKoster. Editorial: 1. Tour of cosmonomia. The Banner. February 22, 1974. pp. 4-5.
  • Lester DeKoster Editorial: 2. Bird’s eye view of cosmonomia. The Banner. March 8,1974. pp. 4-5.
  • Antoni Diller. Herman Dooyeweerd – a profile of his thought. Spectrum 22:2 Summer 1990. pp. 138- 154.
  • John M. Frame. Toronto, Reformed orthodoxy, and the word of God: Where do we go from here? Vanguard. January-February 1975 . pp. 6-8.

Rushdooney’s Introduction to the 1960 edn

Filed under: Introduction

Summary Rushdoony in his introduction to this book does not provide a review but rather ‘an analysis of its general significance’.

R. J. Rushdoony 1916-2001

Review questions

 

1. Why, according to Rushdoony, would Dooyeweerd be the first to ‘disclaim originality’ to his approach?

2. What, according to Rushdoony, are the implications of Joseph Haroutunian’s Lust for Power?

3. What points does Rushdoony draw out in his discussion of ‘Rudolf Bultmann on science’?

4. Why does Dooyeweerd use the word motive and not motif?

Study questions

1. In what ways is Dooyeweerd’s approach to Christian philosophy a development on the biblical foundations of Calvin and Kuyper?

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Jay of onefinejay.com